Hallo Chris,Gecko hat geschrieben: Was mich hier jedoch brennend interessiert: Wenn man Vigna del Sorbo bzw. Flaccianello beschreiben würde/könnte, wie unterscheiden sich diese beiden geschmacklich von der normalen Annata?
die Kunst der Weinlyrik beherrsche ich leider nicht, zudem habe ich die Weine nicht gegeneinander getrunken. Aber vielleicht helfen Dir die Beschreibungen von Galloni weiter:
The 2016 Chianti Classico Fontodi brings together all the elements that make the Fontodi wines so unique, but with an extra kick of freshness and aromatic intensity that is the result of a year with notable diurnal shifts during the growing season. Dark blue/purplish fruit, lavender, spice and menthol develop in the glass, but it is the wine's extraordinary balance and sheer appeal that stand out most. In time, 2016 may very well become the new benchmark for Fontodi's Chianti Classico. The 2016 is flat-out delicious. That's pretty much all there is to it.
The 2016 Chianti Classico Gran Selezione Vigna del Sorbo is a wine of tremendous aromatic intensity, freshness and nuance. Sweet floral and spice notes meld into a core of blue/purplish fruit, lavender, licorice and leather, with veins of bright acids that perk things up nicely. Readers need to be patient with the 2016, as it is going to need at least a few years to come into its own. But I have seen this before with Vigna del Sorbo. Sometimes the more reticent vintages turn out the be the most complete and thrilling wines with cellaring. I imagine that will be the case here as well.
The 2016 Flaccianello della Pieve is off the charts. Fresh, vibrant and explosive, with tremendous overall intensity, the 2016 possesses magnificent richness, with sumptuous fruit purity and simply unreal balance. Creamy, silky tannins add to the wine's sophistication and overall polish. The 2016 is dark, inky and powerful, but not at all heavy. Giovanni Manetti gave the 2016 18 months in French oak (75-80% new), followed by 6 months in cask. This is the first vintage in which a small amount (2%) of the wine was aged in amphora. In a word: stunning! Don't miss it.
Ich schließe daraus, dass die Unterschiede insbesondere in der Konzentration und der Struktur, zudem in der Länge des Holzfassausbaus, weniger aber in den Aromen zu suchen sind.
Grüße
Hartmut